Apparently, the official term for kids such as mine, siblings not biologically related who are less than nine months apart, is Artificial Twins. I had no idea there was such a thing, nor that there have actually been articles written about Artificial Twinning. Coincidentally, I found out by tracing a google search someone else made. The search engine found a match on this very blog (to my article referencing the kiddobeans as Virtual Twins), resulting in a hit on my site. I tracked back on the search and found these two other articles which discuss Artificial Twinning. Neither was very encouraging.
The articles, found in an index at adopting.org, were written by an adoption specialist, Richard van Deelen, and an advocate for infertile couples, Patricia Irwin Johnston, respectively. Both focus on the folly of intentionally creating Artificial Twins (also referred to as Pseudo Twins or Virtual Twins) either by double-duty adoption or by deliberately continuing fertility assistance while pursing adoption. The fact is, of course, that Phil and I did neither of these things to result in our Artificial Twinning. Little Miss was already placed with us when we were completely blindsided by the realization of Little Man's imminent arrival. There was no collusion or deception, or even deliberately planning (unless you count God's deliberate plan), that resulted in our unique family. Nevertheless, my defenses went up upon first reading the articles. Who are these people to make judgments on my family, anyway!
That was my impression on the initial read-through. After a second read, though, I had to admit that the articles had a real point. In fact, it is the point that I am continually trying to make to people who think it's "so cute" to have the two little guys so close together or prospective adoptive parents who "hope it happens" to them. Artificial Twinning is really, really hard on the parents! You have kids at different development levels who are continually put in situations where they have to respond as if they are the same age. You have two sets of early childhood needs to contend with, like multiple well-baby doctor visits, two babies who need to be hand fed, two babies needing attention during the night, and possibly even two sets of Early Intervention physical therapy. You have constant attention from well-meaning strangers who are burning with curiosity about your family, leading to discussions of adoption and infertility in the most unlikely of places. It's just not easy. So, I guess since it's not a situation that I would recommend anyone to deliberately seek out, I can't get defensive when the experts agree with me.
Both articles make the point that parents who seek out a situation with Artificial Twins are probably acting from a desire (born of infertility) to secure a family asap, even if that involves multiple babies. The experts say that these parents are not looking past the baby in their arms to the potential problems later as their family grows. Only the second article, with the sobering title "Instant Family? The Case Against Artificial Twinning", actually ended on a positive note by offering advice for families like mine that want to thrive in this situation. Two points I'm really going to consider are 1) Set clear boundaries on how you communicate with people about your family. Not every question about adoption/infertility from a stranger or acquaintance deserves a super-detailed answer. Kids want their privacy too. 2) Help the kids grow their separate identities by keeping them in different grades in school if possible. That'll require some thought, but I am now once again leaning toward separating them in school. We'll see. I change my mind about every 5 minutes on this.
So there you go. We're a sociological phenomenon. Who knew? Anybody out there also parenting Artificial Twins? What's your story? Anybody out there considering it? I've decided that, looking past the defensiveness I feel at this implied criticism of my family, my advice has to be the same as the experts. Don't seek it out. It's tough on you and on the kids. My own addition to the articles is--if you find yourself in that situation for one reason or another, embrace it. There can be great blessings in having a unique family. My hope is that Richard van Deenan and Patricia Irwin Johnston, realists that they are, might stumble on this site one day and get a perspective on the blessings as well as the challenges. There is nothing "artificial" about the sibling and parental love in a unique family like mine.





